Head-tail placement has to do with which carbon the R group is placed
on (this contrasts with
tacticity where which side the R group is on is the issue.)
H H
| |
C - C
| |
H R
The carbon with the R on it can be called the "head", and then to
maintain consistency, the carbon, and the carbon
without the R should be called the tail.
Sperling calls a polystyrene connection with two benzene groups
on adjacent carbons a "head-to-head", so from this it follows
that the presence of an R group on a carbon makes that carbon a
"head" carbon.
H H H H
| | | |
C - C - C - C Head to Tail placement
| | | |
H R H R
|-----|
H H H H
| | | |
C - C - C - C Head to Head placement
| | | |
H R R H
|-----|
H H H H
| | | |
C - C - C - C Tail to Tail placement
| | | |
R H H R
|-----|
I've never seen an author talk about tail-to-tail placement. They always
say "head-to-tail" or "head-to-head." Strictly speaking, tail-to-tail
is just as legimate as head-to-head.
Assume a reaction where head-to-head is highly unlikely (steric hindrance
maybe.) If tail-to-tail occurs, as shown above, then that leaves
a head at the end, and since another head can't react with it, only
a tail will come in and react. But this head to tail leaves another
head in the end, so you can see we're in a loop that forces head-tail
reactions. A table of scenarios is provided:
|
|
| | head-to-head
| | | head-to-tail
| | | tail-to-tail
| | | what to call the outcome
| |
|
|
|
| | easy
| | | easy
| | | easy
| | | random orienticity
| |
|
|
|
| | not likely
| | | easy
| | | easy
| | | head-tail orienticity
| |
|
|
|
| | easy
| | | easy
| | | not likely
| | | head-tail orienticity
| |
|
|
Now, there may be a situation where head-head, head-tail, and tail-tail
are possible, but the probabilities are different for each one. I don't
know if research has been carried out in this area.