|
|
The Success Of Blitzkreig by Anonymous
[Save this
essay for later viewing] [View Saved Essays]
The Blitzkrieg tactic was a tactic developed by the Germans but more
specifically by Hanz Guderian. He produced a book, Achtung Panzer. He
said, Strike hard, strike quickly, and do not disperse your forces. Hence
the name, Blitzkrieg, which means, lightning war.
Blitzkrieg tactics definitely played a very big
part in the defeat of Germany's enemies. The Germans definitely had
superior air power with their Ju-87 Stuka dive bombers. The Luftwaffe did
rule the skies with majority in numbers, and more effective aircraft. On
the ground however, it was a different matter. The Panzers (German tanks)
were outnumbered by the British and French tanks. The tactic in which they
deployed made them superior. The British and French spread their tanks
out. They gave each infantry platoon a certain number of tanks. Maybe a
pair, maybe a few more but the basic message is that their tanks were more
or less independent and fought alongside infantry. The difference with the
German tanks, was that they moved in divisions. They had Panzer armoured
divisions of about three or four hundred tanks which were much more
powerful than an infantry section with a few tanks. The massing of tanks
was also a part of Blitzkrieg and that helped immensely. The object of
surprise played a major role in the war. Poland had more men and if they
knew the Germans were coming, Germany still would have won but they would
have suffered a great deal more of losses.
Blitzkrieg was an ingenious war tactic yet it
wasn't the only reason for which Germany defeated its enemies. Germany
also tactfully new where to attack and knew the areas where they would not
be expected to come through. The maginot line was a series of really
strong forces along the French-German border. It was 93 miles long but it
was 250 miles short of the sea. The French began building extensions but
they weren't finished in time. The French had 400,000 men on the Maginot
line and both the French and the Germans knew that attacking the Maginot
line would be suicidal to attack. The Allies predicted that the Germans
would attack from northern Belgium. They thought this because southern
Belgian was home to the Ardennes, a hilly region covered in woodland.The
Allies predicted that if the Germans attacked from there, and a big IF at
that, then it would take them 2 weeks at least to break through the dense
woods and even then only in small numbers.Well, the Germans attacked from
there and the French only had 100,000 unequipped, badly trained men,
there.The Germans broke through the hills in 3 days, and they broke
through by the hundreds of thousands 1800 Panzers broke through and
infantry sections came through by the thousands.
They entered France and trapped the Allied troops in Belgium. The
fact that they got through in 3 days played a major role. If it had taken
them longer, the outcome would have been different as the 500,000 troops
up north could have gotten back to help. The breakthrough was thanks to
German military engineers, road builders, and demolition squads. They blew
up trees, lay roads and paved ways through to allow the Germans to get
through. This was another tactic used other than Blitzkrieg to help the
Germans destroy their enemies. Hitler's sheer genius helped the situation
a lot. he used the first wave of his army to circle around and trap the
500,000 allied troops in Belgium. The first wave trapped them there as the
rest of the German troops invaded France. They covered 200 miles in 7 days
and very soon, there were 12,000,000 refugees walking the streets of
France.The Luftwaffe made random passes at the refugees killing as many as
possible. The fact that the French government and military leaders changed
at that time didn't help.The Commander in Chief was Gamelin.
He was clever but he had no guts.Also, he was 62.He rarely set foot
outside of the French headquarters at Vincennes (which didn't have any
radio communications which couldn't make the situation any better).He was
replaced by Weygand who was 73.He was a little old for the job.The Premier
was replaced by Marshal Petain who was 83.Holland was attacked at this
time as well and they were decimated.They surrendered on the 14th of May
and Belgium surrendered on May the 27th.May 25th, Bologne fell, 26th
Calais.Hitler had won.Dunkirk was defeated on the 4th of June and the
Allies returned home bruised and battered.They had been pinned on the
beaches being shot at waiting for an evacuation that was being put
together as hastily as possible. The English squandered any boats that
they could find and sent them in to evacuate the poor soldiers.The battle
of Dunkirk was described by Hitler as one of the greatest German victories
of all times.Germans were celebrating all over Germany on that night.
Mussolini joined the war as Hitler's ally on the 10th of June.He was
somewhat helpful to Hitler as he had some of Northern Africa and Greece
under his control.However,the Allies moved in and swept through the
Italian forces extremely fast.Hitler went to his Italian compatriot's
rescue and fought the Allies away by using paratroopers (the first time
they had been used effectively ever).Hitler took the land back in a few
weeks.He didn't know this at the time but his move to help Mussolini
proved fatal to his main goal, the taking of Russia.If he had moved in on
Russia just a few weeks (how long it took to help Mussolini) then it is
thought today that he might have beaten Russia. After all, it wasn't the
Russian army that destroyed the Germans. It was the Russian
winter.Hitler's taking over of his enemies wasn't just because of
Blitzkrieg (although it did play a major role) but also because of
Hitler's sheer genius.He convinced Germans that they could defeat their
enemies by speech, that was what he was on the outside, a great
speaker.What he was on the inside however, unfortunately for the
opposition, was a genius.He could tactfully place his troops to make a
nearly, in some cases, unstoppable force.France, Belgium, Holland, Poland,
and all of the other countries which he spread hiscarnage through,
suffered great losses and were harshly hammered.
Even if he was one of the bad guys, Hitler had one of the greatest war
minds of the century, ranking high with the likes of Machiavelli and
Julius Caesar. Hitler and his Blitzkrieg were truly devastating.
Not the Essay you want?
Have a look at this
massive database of essays, or get some custom research done for you.
Related LinksAt what point
did the defeat of Nazi Germany become inevitable The Second World
War started in September 1939 with the German invasion of Poland. After
this there was a period of “phoney war” between September 1939 and May
1940. It is called a “phoney war” because of the lack of any noticeable
activity by either side. Then on May 10th 1940 Germany launched Oper
... (User Rating: 10.00 | Length: 3.1 Pages )
Battle of the
Somme The battle of the Somme began in the summer of 1916. The
British saw their opportunity to look good and be the saviour of the
moment. However, this did not occur. A four hundred and fifty mile trench
network, stretching from the Swiss border up and into Belgium, was opened
up and the battle had tru ... (Length: 4.6 Pages )
British
Domestic life During WW2 Up until 1941 the people of Britain went
through a lot of problems regarding many issues such as supplies, bombing
and keeping up the countries general morale. However in 1941 Britain had
managed to turn the war round, in the battle of Britain, so that the
Allies were now on top of the Germa ... (User Rating: 6.00 | Length: 5.2 Pages )
Czechoslovakia Czechoslovakia
Two
weeks after the Anschluss, Hitler was already thinking of other
things. He said he would soon be ready to "solve" the
Czechoslovakian problem.
Czechoslovakia was a new country. It had been formed in 1918 out of
parts of Austria/Hungary. Ab ... (User Rating: 2.50 | Length: 2.3 Pages )
Did the soviets
cause the defeat of Germany in World War II? Operation Barbarossa,
in which Germany launched a huge land campaign on the Russian soil, was
the start of the War's turning point. The repercussion of this was the
counter-attack by the Soviet Union. Why was the Soviet Union successful in
the attack? Firstly she only had one front to fight o
... (User Rating: 9.50 | Length: 7.1 Pages )
Hardship in
Britain during World War II By 1941, the Second World War had
brought considerable hardship and disruption to the British civilian
population. Was this still the case in the last twelve months of the war,
1944-45? Explain your answer. By 1941, many of Britain's cities were in
ruins, and her population was seemingly demoralise
... (User Rating: 9.67 | Length: 4.7 Pages )
Hiroshima
Sources Question In August 1945, atomic bombs were dropped on
Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Why did the American government decide to carry
out these attacks? On 6th August 1945, the first of the two fatal bombs
was dropped on the army base of Hiroshima. Three days later on the 9th
August, the second was dropped on Na ... (Length: 3.6 Pages )
Hitler does not
deserve sole blame for the outbreak of World War
2 In the
late 1920’s a German dictator and War veteran called Adolf Hitler rose to
power in Germany. In his campaign he promised the people of Germany
that he would make their country great again. German voters loved
Hitler’s optimism, all of Europe was caught up in the depression and the
... (User Rating: 4.00 | Length: 6.6 Pages )
How important
were economic and technological factors in determining the outcome of the
Second World On May 7th 1945 Germany surrendered to the allied
powers and the Second World War in Europe was over. This essay will
examine how important economic and technological factors were in deciding
the outcome of the Second World War in Europe. Many new technologies,
which had been greatly developed duri ... (User Rating: 7.00 | Length: 3.1 Pages )
Sources Question:
The German Surrender at Stalingrad The German surrender at
Stalingrad, February 1943 1) Source A is a message from Paulus, the
Commander of the Sixth Army, indicating that this source is reliable and
therefore is bound to provide accurate view of what was going on in
Stalingrad, including the information that were classified. It te
... (User Rating: 10.00 | Length: 6.2 Pages )
The Final
Solution : Racial Cleansing Sources Question Q1. To what extent do
the views in Source D support the information on the Final Solution in
Source A? Source A suggests that the mass murders carried out by the
Einsatzgruppen took place to the east of Greater Germany. This is
supported in source B: “In the course of the Final Solution, the J
... (Length: 5.3 Pages )
The importance of
Blitzkreig in World War II In Poland and in Western Europe in 1939
and 1940 , the German armydefeated it's enemies quickly.Was this only
because of the Blitzkrieg tactics? In 1939 and 1940 the Germans defeated
their opponents using a tactic called Blitzkrieg. This was not the only
way that Hitler's army defeated their opponen ... (User Rating: 7.25 | Length: 2.8 Pages )
The Success Of
Blitzkreig The Blitzkrieg tactic was a tactic developed by the
Germans but more specifically by Hanz Guderian. He produced a book,
Achtung Panzer. He said, Strike hard, strike quickly, and do not disperse
your forces. Hence the name, Blitzkrieg, which means, lightning war.
Blitzkrieg tactics definitely playe ... (User Rating: 7.00 | Length: 3.2 Pages )
The Success Of
Blitzkreig II In Poland in 1939 and in Western Europe in 1940, the
German army defeated its enemies quickly. Was this only because of the
Blitzkrieg tactics used?This tactic worked immensely well and was almost
completely successful. However though Blitzkrieg was definitely not the
only tactic used in the war it ... (User
Rating: 1.00 | Length: 5.1 Pages
)
To what extent
did the Home Front in Britain affect the outcome of the second world
war To what extent did the Home Front in Britain affect the outcome
of the Second World War? In September 1939 Britain went to war against
Germany, the war lasted until 1945 in Europe. Throughout this time there
was always on front, which was constant, this was the home front. The home
front was the ... (Length: 3.4
Pages )
Up to about
the End of 1942 Germany was Usually Successful on the battlefield and was
Generally adva Up to about the End of 1942 Germany was Usually
Successful on the battlefield and was Generally advancing. From the
Beginning of 1943 Germany was Usually Unsuccessful on the Battlefield and
was Generally Retreating. Explain why this Change Happened. Germany was
usually successful on the battlef ... (User Rating: 1.00 | Length: 4.4 Pages )
Weapons and
Technology of WW2 World War One brought about many new weapons and
advancements in technology on both sides. Both took huge steps towards
modern technology and these carried on even after the war had begun. Yet
these weapons could not be of much advantage to one side for very long,
because the other side immediatel ... (User Rating: 10.00 | Length: 6.6 Pages )
What was the
Holocaust? In 6AD the Jewish people were expelled from their
homeland in the
Middle
East by the Muslim invaders. They scattered to various parts of the
world, many settling in Europe where they were disliked due to their
religious beliefs, language, looks etc. Many were jealous of the Jews
... (User Rating: 5.67 | Length: 14.9 Pages )
Why And How did
Britain survive The War from 1940-1943 `As you can see from this
map war was raging in Europe in 1940 and Britain was in big trouble.
Germany appeared unstoppable as the defeat of Poland had taken just under
a month in September 1939 by using their new Blitzkrieg tactics in which
tanks would converge in one big group and punch a massi
... (User Rating: 8.50 | Length: 12.5 Pages )
Why did America
go to war with Japan It is commonly thought that America went to
war with Japan on December 8th 1941 because of the Pearl Harbour bombings.
However, war had been on Roosevelt’s mind long before this event.
Roosevelt had never been much of an isolationist and had foreseen American
involvement in the war, even if he had b ... (User Rating: 6.00 | Length: 0.8 Pages )
|